3/25/2012

Juan Felipe García - Los Arcanos, modelos de justicia. (2009)

Conferencia Internacional
Crisis global e interna: Constitución, Derechos, Justicia y Conflicto.


Juan Felipe García-Arboleda. - Universidad Javeriana.

1 comentario:

Anónimo dijo...

El señor Garcia, solo habla en terminos metafisicos imposibles de ser falsificados, es como el psicoanalista que el paciente le dice estoy negando al padre, y el psicoanalista le responde muy bien has hallado tu sintoma, pero si el paciente le dice yo no estoy negando al padre, el psicoanalista le dice si ves lo estas negando, segun el señor garcia nos tenemos que identificar con lo que el llama pueblo colombiano, porque todos somos unos burguesitos vacios, si a alguien le gusta el reggaeton dejelo no es su problema, o es que debemos seguirlo a Ud porque Ud nos va a enseñar como vivir de la forma correcta, como dice Slajov Zizek al que le gusta citar tanto en sus clases; For Rousseau, an evil person is NOT an egotist, "thinking only about his own interests": a true egotist is all too busy with taking care of his own good to have time to cause misfortunes to others, while the primary vice of a bad person is precisely that he is more occupied with others than with himself. Rousseau describes here a precise libidinal mechanism: the inversion which generates the shift of the libidinal investment from the object to the obstacle itself. This is why egalitarianism itself should never be accepted at its face value: the notion (and practice) of egalitarian justice, insofar as it is sustained by envy, relies on the inversion of the standard renunciation accomplished to benefit others: "I am ready to renounce it, so that others will (also) NOT (be able to) have it!" Far from being opposed to the spirit of sacrifice, Evil is thus the very spirit of sacrifice, ready to ignore one's own well-being - if, through my sacrifice, I can deprive the Other of his jouissance... Is this sad fact that the opposition to the system cannot articulate itself in the guise of a realistic alternative, or at least a meaningful utopian project, but only as a meaningless outburst, not the strongest indictment of our predicament? Where is here the celebrated freedom of choice, when the only choice is the one between playing by the rules and (self-)destructive violence, a violence which is almost exclusively directed against one's own - the cars burned and the schools torched were not from rich neighborhoods, but were part of the hard-won acquisitions of the very strata from which protesters originate. Creo que el problema son personas que no aceptan otras formas de subjetividad, que creen que el mundo esta mal y que por eso toca imponer un modelo que ellos creen como verdadero, al contrario lo que se necesita es masd indiferencia, si Ud. quiere vivir como un capitalista lo puede hacer, si no le gusta forme otras formas comunitarias el estado tiene el deber de respetar lo anterior y de aceptar la diferencia, de aceptar la autodeterminacion y la autonomia dentro de cuiertos limites...